Because it's significantly better and is being maintained.Why BS v3 ?
Joomla is using Bootstrap 2, which is end-of-life and not being maintained by core Bootstrap team anymore. It is lacking a lot of great features that Bootstrap 3 offers.You are not using J! core JUI files?
We don't use Joomla icons either. We use fontawesome which is a lot better than icomoon.(I am aware of the BS3 grid advantages and icon fonts. But the latter could be achieved in many other ways. i.e. the J! build-in icomoon font)
Our Bootstrap 3 and Fontawesome are both namespaced with .cb_template. They will only style CB. In addition to this global parameters are being added to shut off our loading of Bootstrap 3 and/or Fontawesome. What this means is if you've something else loading Bootstrap 3 you can turn off CBs and CB will style just fine, because we are using Bootstrap 3 markup correctly.My concern: I guess you are going to add your own BS3 files… and many other extensions incl. the main template are going to load JUI files. Overhead and CSS glitches? Not to mention, some other developers like Stackideas and also Joomlart add there own BS v3 as well?! What a mess, IMHO.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.